|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Redwood City’s debate over its proposed anti-camping ordinance picked up again Monday night, when the City Council reintroduced the measure with revisions — making July’s hourslong discussion essentially moot.
The updated ordinance adds waterways as “sensitive areas” where encampments can be cleared with 48 hours’ notice instead of 72. It also gives San Mateo County explicit authority to enforce the law, a change city staff said was needed to finalize a memorandum of understanding with the county.
The measure passed 6–1, with Council member Chris Sturken again casting the lone no vote. Sturken said the ordinance risks doing more harm than good, especially by leaving in criminal penalties of up to a $100 fine or six months in jail.
“Based on the county’s own experience, penalties aren’t necessary,” he said, pointing to San Mateo County’s record of enforcing a similar law without issuing citations or jail time. “That’s not who we are as a city.” He also raised concerns about deaths in the county jail, questioning whether unhoused residents should be exposed to a system with such risks.
Other council members said the ordinance strikes a balance between compassion and public safety.
Vice Mayor Kaia Eakin called it a “carrot and stick” approach, with incentives to connect people to shelter, but enforcement still on the table.
Council member Jeff Gee said the penalties help courts direct people into diversion programs if they repeatedly refuse services.
The staff report noted that Monday’s reintroduction was intended to incorporate concerns raised in July, when council members and residents called for clearer county involvement, stronger protections for waterways, and an ongoing council committee to monitor outcomes. Those elements are now part of the ordinance and the companion resolution.
The ordinance will return for a second reading in September.
If approved, it would take effect 30 days later; however, staff cautioned that enforcement may not begin until early next year, as the city builds its system with the county. Redwood City expects to use part of its $2.85 million state Encampment Resolution Fund grant to help cover costs, but warned that additional expenses may surface and could require mid-year budget adjustments.
Public testimony lighter this round
Unlike July’s marathon meeting, only a handful of residents spoke Monday. Some backed adding waterways to the ordinance, citing pollution and fire hazards, while others urged the council to strip out penalties, warning of long-term harm to unhoused residents.
Well….I’m actually out here…in an RV…as for the offering of services..I’ve seen life moves vans see homeless people and keep driving….and how are we counting people who were offered services…
The people I talk to haven’t been offered anything .